Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Movie Magic

I just finished watching Away From Her, which was quite a good movie. There was one part, however, which drove me nuts. I'm sure that it's only me--and maybe a handful of car-obsessed people--but during the scenes in which Grant was "driving" his F-150, without fail the steering wheel would be cocked in a completely random direction while the scenery passed straight back. 
I'll give the movie industry credit, the scenery now looks completely real as it passes beyond the windows. My mom, who couldn't give a half a damn about cars, noticed nothing. But the steering wheel issue was really distracting to me. C'mon people, is it really that hard to get that right? It also strikes me as odd that a decent actor, which the guy playing Grant most certainly was, wouldn't protest that something was wrong as he's sitting there doing an entire scene with the wheel cocked a full 270 degrees. I thought actors were supposed to interact with their environment as if it's reality. Hasn't this guy ever driven a car before? Is something not askew when the Ford oval is sideways while you're casually talking to your passenger?

Okay, so by this point, most readers are thinking, "Get a life, dude." But when you consider that studios are always looking to put that extra touch of realism into their productions, this is such as easy way. Hmm, I wonder if it's cause the movie was made by Canadians...

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Knight Rider: A Bit Much

I'm watching the Knight Rider movie right now, and we're in the process of the first chase scene. If you watched it, you may have noticed that every fuckin car is a Ford product. I might've been a bit more excited about that when I was helping make Ford ads, but come on, it's complete overkill. They even used Volvos, Mazdas and Land Rovers. 

Ooh, they just used the nanotechnology to change the look of the car on the fly!

Anyway, one final note: in the interior of the car, they have racing seats, but apparently they needed to find ones that lacked headrests. You know...for rear angle passenger shots. It makes the interior look slightly lame.

Okay, back to the show for me.

Friday, February 15, 2008

Saturday, February 9, 2008

Takin' on the big boys

Well, yesterday I sold my GTI, which leaves me with just the R32 to enjoy. Okay, well, "just" doesn't really enter into it. The car is a blast, and sexy to boot. But don't take my word for it. Car and Driver's March issue has a comparo of this sweetest of VWs with the new versions of the Evo GSR and STI. 

Now, I understand that when it comes to performance, the R32 is not quite in the same league as those Japanese ralliers, so as I eagerly turned the pages to find the article, I braced myself for a 3rd-place finish. Not today, my good friends! The V Dub dropped a deuce in C/D, and the car that was shat upon was the Subaru WRX STI. I think readers woulda cried bloody murder had the R32 finished on top, so I can accept its runner-up status. And although the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR may have finished first, the article states that "two of our three-guy test crew admitted the R32 is the car they'd buy of this group." I call this a solid victory for the underdog here. 

Unfortunately Car and Driver is pretty slow about posting their latest articles online--obviously a strategy to maintain print circulation--so I can't link to it yet. I'll get that posted as soon as I can. But suffice to say, they loved all the things about it that I do (and that I loved about my GTI). The refinement and beautiful interior make it the luxury car of the group, while that exhaust note was characterized as "Porsche-like". An in fact, the performance that C/D was able to wring out of the car was surprisingly competitive. With a 0-60 run of 5.4 seconds, it was less than a second behind the best-in-test Evo, and over a second faster than my GTI (6.5 sec is the only published number I've been able to find for the GTI VR6). This, despite being around 550 lbs. heavier than the latter. 

As I was sifting through the performance tables that C/D so obligingly provides, I noticed a piece of data that exemplifies why I so love the R32, and VW's VR6 engine that prompted me to buy it. It perfectly illustrates the advantage of having a V6 engine so well packaged as to be able to fit in a small car. There's an oft-overlooked column in the tables that lists top gear acceleration, which is particularly relevant when it comes to day-to-day, around-town driving. In top gear (6th for the VW and Subi, 5th for the Mitsu) the last-place STI requires 11.9 seconds to go from 30-50 mph. The first place Evo takes 9.0 seconds to do the deed. But the R32's 3.2L VR6 engine blows those turbo fours out of the water. It needs just 3.2 seconds--quite fitting. 

Consider that the Tesla roadster tested in the same issue needs 2.3 seconds to do this. This is a car renowned for its instant torque due to its electric motor, so it's striking that the R32's performance in this regard is so much closer to the Tesla's than to its competition possessing 290 to 300 lb-ft of torque from their 4-cylinder turbo gas engines. It's pretty simple when you see that the R32's peak torque is available at 2500 rpm, while the turbos need to spool to 4000 or 4400 rpm to achieve greatness. 

Conclusion: My car rocks.

Monday, February 4, 2008

My Legacy


Ford ran an ad during the Super Bowl in which the F-150 was flung around on a centrifuge by its tow hooks. I beamed with pride. This was precisely the kind of research that I did when I was working at the ad agency, and in fact, I researched this very claim. It's a shame they had to wait until I was gone for almost a year, not to mention until near the end of the current F-150's lifecycle, to start running sweet ads for it. But, that's the nature of ad planning and budgeting.

You can check out that ad, as well as a few others for which I did some research, at Ford's website.

Friday, February 1, 2008

Audi SUS?

Autoblog just posted this spy pic of an A4 allroad test mule:


At the end of the article John Neff proclaims that the AB crew is pining for a sedan version (the real one will be a wagon, like the A6 allroad). Why? Don't they remember how lame the Subaru Outback SUS was? Why don't they just get themselves a ridiculous BMW X6? To me, the sedan version would make a pretty dumb production car.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Gr8 G8



I just got back from a drive in the hills with the new Pontiac G8 GT, and I thought I'd share my impressions. First of all, the car looks great, as I've always felt. It's no boring family sedan. I've included the picture I was in from Automotive News at the Chicago show last year, but the red version is the one we have. I really feel like the GT model (which includes the powerful V8) should have xenons standard, but they won't even be offered. WTF!!! And of course the approach lighting feature includes the backup lights in the rear, which is something I hate.





Pontiac came last week to drop off the car, and we went for a ride. I drove it pretty much just on local surface roads, so didn't get a good idea of its real handling prowess at that point. The car seemed to have a bit more roll than I'd expected, and the brakes were pretty squishy, feeling pre-faded. It wasn't the best first impression, but the car certainly deserved another chance. I was handed the key again today, and I took it to my new favorite hot spot in the Santa Barbara hills.


When it came to the twisties, my impression changed. The car seemed to hunker down on more challenging, lower speed curves, taking them on with aplomb. The brakes seemed a little better today, though they don't inspire as much confidence and you might hope. It could be particular to this car. It's likely a press mule that's been flung around by Car and Driver, etc. Aside from that point, the car is certainly tossable. It feels lighter than it is, and although one of my colleagues said he didn't like the steering feel, I actually think it's tuned pretty well, with the right weight and good on-center feel. The extra body roll in more relaxed driving seems to be part of the tuning compromise that's likely been made for the American market. The suspension was very comfy, and soaks up speed bumps easily.


Up in the hills its rear drive nature came out, with the relatively easy ability to get the tail dancing. This was exaggerated even more by the touchy throttle tip-in, which can make it difficult to transition back onto the gas smoothly. At this point I was using the shiftable feature of the auto tranny, and as someone who drives a car with a DSG, it's pretty jarring to feel the limitations of a slush box in a car like this. In fact, the configuration of the autostick was not the best. When you first shift toward the manual gate (a bit too high-effort...hopefully they'll fix it by sale time) the car goes into sport mode. You actually have to make a shift to get it into manual mode, which to me defeats the purpose, since the whole point of manual mode is often to let you stay in the current gear longer when the situation calls for it. My R32's gearshift has a seperate position for sport mode, as it should.


Once you're into manual mode, though, it's a decent experience, with relatively quick shifts (for an auto). The quality of the experience is brought down a bit by the shape of the shifter, though, which is made more for an auto, and doesn't feel like it's meant for frequent shifting. This brings us to the issue of the lack of shifter paddles behind the wheel. While one might argue that these are a bit faddish, I did feel a sincere need for them, especially in the twisty sections and with that subpar shifter feel. And Pontiac has even offered them on the 4-speed Grand Prix GXP. C'mon Pontiac, pleeeeeease.


Okay, let's talk about the engine. It's great. Torquey whenever you need it, and it sounds superb, too. With a macho rumble around town (while still not too loud), it builds to a high-energy growl at speed, which was fun to listen to as it echoed off the hillsides. Anything that's lacking in the drivetrain I'd blame on the transmission. That tranny is tuned for the best possible fuel economy, and it seems to be very eager to upshift. 


As we come to the interior of the car, you've gotta compliment those Aussies. They know how to do it, pretty much on the level of the Germans. It's about time GM tapped them not just for RWD platform engineering, but for car insides, too. Of course, with the Down Under design, there are a few curiosities you might have to get over. First of all, the window and mirror controls are on the center console, as opposed to the doors. This makes it easier to offer the car in both left- and right-hand drive, but many customers will be put off by this. I'd imagine that's mostly because of convention, and after a while it would feel pretty normal.




There are also some examples that don't seem to make as much sense. I've included a picture of the show car, because it illustrates nicely the meter screen at the top of the stack. It has digital meters for the battery charge and oil pressure, and they're both unchangeable. It seems weird, and it's possible GM could change this before showroom time. Either way, it's still a great looking interior, and it'll easily outshine anything the Pontiac has had before.


Okay, so it may seem like I have a lot of nits to pick with this car, but the fact is, it's fantastic, especially in light of GM's past. I personally believe, and I think most other enthusiasts would agree, that of the Detroit 3, GM is the one that's really getting their shit together. In my line of work, we tend to handicap brands a lot based on brand equity, and Pontiac certainly has an uphill battle ahead of it in that regard. But in my experience, this G8 is one car that can handle those hills.


Now if they'd only put a stick in the damn thing...